Mini Case R.K Maroon

Topics: Venture capital, Finance, Corporate finance Pages: 3 (553 words) Published: December 29, 2013
MINI CASE: R.K.MAROON COMPANY
R.K. Maroon is a seed-stage web-oriented entertainment company with important intellectual property. RKM’s founders, all technology experts in the relevant area, are anticipating a quick leap to dot-com fortune and believe that their unique intellectual property will allow them to achieve a subsequent (year 3) $100,000,000 venture value with a one-time initial $2,000,000 in venture financing.

In contrast, similar dot-commers in their niche are currently seeking multistage financing amounting to $10,000,000 to achieve comparable results. The founders have organized with 1,000,000 shares and are willing to “grant” venture investors a 100% return on their business plan projections.

A. What percent of ownership must be sold to “grant” the 100% three-year return? 2,000,000*(1+1)^3=16,000,000
Percent owned by investors = 16,000,000 / 100,000,000 = 16%
B. What is the resulting configuration of share ownership (starting from the 1,000,000 founders’ shares?
1,000,000 / .84 = 1,190,476 total shares
190,476 new shares issued to investors
1,000,000 founder shares
C. Suppose the venture investors don’t buy the business plan predictions and want to price the deal assuming a second round in year 2 of $8,000,000 with a 40% return. What changes?
8,000,000(1.4)^1=11,200,000
Second round investor final ownership = 11,200,000 / 100,000,000 = 11.2% Founder final ownership = 1 - .16 -.112 = .728
Total shares outstanding at exit = 1,000,000 / .728 = 1,373,626 Second round shares = 153,846; final ownership = .112
First round shares = 219,780 ; final ownership = 219,780 / 1,373,626 = .16 Founder shares = 1,000,000; final ownership = 1,000,000 / 1,373,626 = .728 D. Suppose the venture investors agree with the founders’ assessment, price the deal accordingly (as in Part B) and turn out to be wrong (an additional $8,000,000 at 40% must be injected for the final year).

1. What is the impact on the founders’ and round one investors’ final ownership...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Mini Case Essay
  • Mini Case Essay
  • mini cases Essay
  • Mini Case Essay
  • Mini Case-Gilbert Enterprise Essay
  • Fin 516 Mini Case Essay
  • Porsche Mini-Case Essay
  • Internet Mini Case #1 Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free