Quant Mark Econ (2009) 7:207–236 DOI 10.1007/s11129-009-9066-z
The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data C. Robert Clark · Ulrich Doraszelski · Michaela Draganska
Received: 11 December 2007 / Accepted: 2 April 2009 / Published online: 8 May 2009 © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009
Abstract We use a panel data set that combines annual brand-level advertising expenditures for over three hundred brands with measures of brand awareness and perceived quality from a large-scale consumer survey to study the effect of advertising. Advertising is modeled as a dynamic investment in a brand’s stocks of awareness and perceived quality and we ask how such an investment changes brand awareness and quality perceptions. Our panel data allow us to control for unobserved heterogeneity across brands and to identify the effect of advertising from the time-series variation within brands. They also allow us to account for the endogeneity of advertising through recently developed dynamic panel data estimation techniques. We ﬁnd that advertising has consistently a signiﬁcant positive effect on brand awareness but no signiﬁcant effect on perceived quality. Keywords Advertising · Brand awareness · Perceived quality · Dynamic panel data methods JEL Classiﬁcation L15 · C23 · H37 C. R. Clark Institute of Applied Economics, HEC Montreal and CIRPEE, 3000 Chemin de la Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec H3T 2A7, Canada e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org U. Doraszelski Department of Economics, Harvard University, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA e-mail: email@example.com ) M. Draganska (B Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5015, USA e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
C.R. Clark et al.
1 Introduction In 2006 more than $280 billion were spent on advertising in the U.S., well above 2% of GDP. By investing in advertising, marketers aim to encourage consumers to choose their brand. For a consumer to choose a brand, two conditions must be satisﬁed: First, the brand must be in her choice set. Second, the brand must be preferred over all the other brands in her choice set. Advertising may facilitate one or both of these conditions. In this research we empirically investigate how advertising affects these two conditions. To disentangle the impact on choice set from that on preferences, we use actual measures of the level of information possessed by consumers about a large number of brands and of their quality perceptions. We compile a panel data set that combines annual brand-level advertising expenditures with data from a large-scale consumer survey, in which respondents were asked to indicate whether they were aware of different brands and, if so, to rate them in terms of quality. These data offer the unique opportunity to study the role of advertising for a wide range of brands across a number of different product categories. The awareness score measures how well consumers are informed about the existence and the availability of a brand and hence captures directly the extent to which the brand is part of consumers’ choice sets. The quality rating measures the degree of subjective vertical product differentiation in the sense that consumers are led to perceive the advertised brand as being better. Hence, our data allow us to investigate the relationship between advertising and two important dimensions of consumer knowledge. The behavioral literature in marketing has highlighted the same two dimensions in the form of the size of the consideration set and the relative strength of preferences (Nedungadi 1990; Mitra and Lynch 1995). It is, of course, possible that advertising also affects other aspects of consumer knowledge. For example, advertising may generate some form of subjective horizontal product differentiation that is unlikely to be reﬂected in either brand awareness or perceived quality. In a...
References: Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2001). A theory of political transition. American Economic Review, 91(4), 938–963. Ackerberg, D. (2001). Empirically distinguishing between informative and prestige effects of advertising. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(2), 316–333. Anand, B., & Shachar, R. (2004). Advertising the matchmaker. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of speciﬁcation for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at instrumental variable estimation of error component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–52. Assmus, G., Farley, J., & Lehmann, D. (1984). How advertising affects sales: Meta analysis of econometric results. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), 65–74. Bass, F., Bruce, N., Majumdar, S., & Murthi, B. (2007). Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship. Marketing Science, 26(2), 179–195. Blackburn, J., & Clancy, K. (1982). LITMUS: A new product planning model. In A. Zoltners (Ed.), Marketing planning models (pp. 43–62). North-Holland, Amsterdam. Blattberg, R., & Golanty, J. (1978). Tracker: An early test market forecasting and diagnostic model for new product planning. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 192–202. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Working paper CWP09/02, The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. Boyer, M., & Moreaux, M. (1999). Strategic underinvestment in informative advertising: The cases of substitutes and complements. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(3), 654–672. Clarke, D. (1976). Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(4), 345–357. Doganoglu, T., & Klapper, D. (2006). Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 4(1), 5–29. Doraszelski, U., & Markovich, S. (2007). Advertising dynamics and competitive advantage. Rand Journal of Economics, 38(3), 557–592. Dube, J., Hitsch, G., & Manchanda, P. (2005). An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3, 107–144. Durlauf, S., Johnson, P., & Temple, J. (2005). Growth econometrics. In P. Aghion, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of econometric growth (Vol. 1A, pp. 555–677). North-Holland, Amsterdam. Erdem, T., Keane, M., & Sun, B. (2008). The impact of advertising on consumer price sensitivity in experience goods markets. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(2), 139–176. Fershtman, C., & Muller, E. (1993). The beneﬁts of being small: Duopolistic competition with market segmentation. Review of Industrial Organization, 8, 101–111. Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kadiyali, V. (1996). Entry, its deterrence, and its accommodaton: A study of the U.S. photographic ﬁlm industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(3), 452–478. Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 160–171. Kirmani, A., & Wright, P. (1989). Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 344–353.
C.R. Clark et al.
Little, J. (1975). Brandaid: A marketing mix model, part 1-structure. Operations Research, 23, 628–655. Lodish, L., Abraham, M., Kalmenson, S., Livelsberger, J., Lubetkin, B., Richardson, B., et al. (1995). How advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable TV advertising experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 125–139. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 796–821. Mitra, A., & Lynch, J. (1995). Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 644–649. Moorthy, S., & Hawkins, S. (2005). Advertising repetition and quality perception. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 354–360. Moorthy, S., & Zhao, H. (2000). Advertising spending and perceived quality. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 221–233. Naik, P., Mantrala, M., & Sawyer, A. (1998). Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Science, 17(3), 214–235. Narayanan, S., & Manchanda, P. (2009). Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Science (in press). Narayanan, S., Manchanda, P., & Chintagunta, P. (2005). Temporal differences in the role of marketing communicating for new product categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 278–291. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Inﬂuencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263–276. Nelson, P. (1970). Advertising and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729–754. Nerlove, M., & Arrow, K. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic considerations. Economica, 29(114), 129–142. Roodman, D. (2007). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Working paper no. 103, Center for Global Development, Washington. Shachar, R., & Anand, B. (1998). The effectiveness and targeting of television advertising. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7, 363–396. Sovinsky Goeree, M. (2008). Limited information and advertising in the US personal computer industry. Econometrica, 76(5), 1017–1074. Stigler, G. (1961). The economics of information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(3), 213–225. Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk costs and market structure. Cambridge: MIT. Tellis, G., & Fornell, C. (1988). Relationship between advertising and product quality over the product life cycle: A contingency theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 64–71. Telser, L. (1964). Advertising and competition. Journal of Political Economy, 72(6), 537–562. Vidale, M., & Wolfe, H. (1957). An operations research study of sales response to advertising. Operations Research, 5(3), 370–381. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A ﬁnite sample correction for the variance of linear efﬁcient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT. Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. Zhang, J., & Li, H. (2007). Do high birth rates hamper economic growth? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 110–117.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document