The Control of “Sex in Advertising” in France
Jean J. Boddewyn, and Esther Loubradou
The growing use and abuse of sex in French advertising prompted strong reactions from consumer and feminist associations, and resulted in extensive and strict public and private controls. Recently, the French self-regulatory system has developed a system involving various stakeholder organizations to analyze social trends related to the acceptability of sexually-oriented ads, develop new voluntary guidelines, solicit complaints and handle them through an independent Jury. The number and proportion of controversial ads has significantly decreased, and French advertising practitioners have been nudged to accept greater professional responsibility in exchange for the freedom of creativity to which they aspire. A few U.S. developments parallel this increasing cooperation between the public and private controllers of the old issue of “taste and decency in advertising” which is not fading in societal importance.
Jean J. Boddewyn is Emeritus Professor of Marketing and International Business, Baruch College (CUNY) (email: Jean.Boddewyn@Baruch.CUNY.edu). He has written extensively since the 1980s on the regulation and self-regulation of advertising around the world. Esther Loubradou holds a Master’s Degree in Communications and a post-graduate degree in Mass Media Law. She is a doctoral candidate in Advertising, Law and Communications at the University of Toulouse, France. Her dissertation deals with Decency and Sexual Content in Mass Media in France (email: firstname.lastname@example.org).
1 Keywords: sex in advertising, advertising control by state and industry in France and the United States.
Many Americans probably associate the French with sexual laxness and have seen their sexcharged ads for perfumes and cosmetics. Yet, France applies very detailed and strict controls – both public and private – to the use of sex in advertising and courts have ruled in a few notorious cases. Besides, its advertising self-regulatory body reports annually to a government ministry about the progress of its endeavors after conducting an annual survey of sex-related ads in certain media, and relatively few ads have recently been found in violation of French laws and industry guidelines. What explains this paradoxical situation, what are the special causes and features of the French control of sex in advertising, and – briefly – how does the U.S. system compare with it? Since nothing has been published in English on the French control system bearing on sex in advertising, this short Note has to be mainly descriptive and interpretive as a springboard for more theoretical and policy-related research. Still, in answer to admonitions to involve various disciplines (Richards 2009; Rotfeld and Stafford 2007; Rotfeld and Taylor 2009), this study is multi-disciplinary to the extent that cultural (e.g., the evolution of sexual mores), political (e.g., the impact of pressure groups), legal (e.g., the development of “co-regulation” combining public and private initiatives) and ethical (e.g., the “professionalization” of advertising practitioners) factors are used to interpret the French situation. One of the authors is French and an expert in communication law while the second one is American and has conducted many studies of advertising regulation and self-regulation in multiple countries. This Note’s public-policy implications are less evident because of the significant differences between the French and U.S. legal and self-regulatory systems, which preclude easy cross-border borrowings. Yet, there is a significant evolution in the United States toward greater cooperation
2 between the U.S. government and some self-regulatory bodies, which is briefly outlined in the last section of this Note. This development can benefit from knowing how the French system has moved toward combining the compulsory and voluntary approaches to the control of sex in advertising, and how the...
References: ARPP (2008), Bilan 2007: Publicité et Image de la Personne Humaine. Paris : Autorité de Régulation Professionnelle de la Publicité. _____ (2009), Bilan 2008: Publicité et Image de la Personne Humaine. Paris : Autorité de Régulation Professionnelle de la Publicité. Beales, J.H. III (2003), “The Federal Trade Commission’s Use of Unfairness Authority: Its Rise, Fall and Resurrection,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), Fall, 192-200. Boddewyn, Jean J. (1989), Sexism and Decency in Advertising: Government Regulation and Industry Self-regulation in 47 Countries. New York: International Advertising Association. _______________ (1991), “Controlling Sex and Decency in Advertising Around the World,” Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 25-35. _______________ (1992), Global Perspectives on Advertising Self-Regulation: Principles and Practices in Thirty-Eight Countries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
14 Bravin, Jess (2010), “Top Court Is Next Level for Games,” Wall Street Journal, 1 November, B1. BVP (2006), L’Image de la Personne Humaine dans la Publicité en 2006. Paris : Bureau de Vérification de la Publicité. BVP (2006), Rapport d’Activité 2005. Paris : Bureau de Vérification de la Publicité. BVP (2007), Rapport d’Activité 2006. Paris : Bureau de Vérification de la Publicité. Capella, Michael L., Ronald P. Hill, Justine M. Rapp, and Jeremy Kees (2010), “The Impact of Violence Against Women in Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising, 39(4), 35-49. Davidson, Kirk (2003), Selling Sin: The Marketing of Socially Unacceptable Products. Westport, CT: Praeger. Edelstein, J.S. (2003), “Self-Regulation of Advertising: An Alternative to Litigation and Government Action,” IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 43: 509-543. Giddens, A. (1993), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Lane, F.S. (2006), The Decency Wars: The Campaign to Cleanse American Culture. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Liptak, Adam (2010), “Law Blocking Sale of Violent Video Games to Minors is Debated,” New York Times, 3 November, A16. Loubradou, Esther (2004), “Du Sexe pour Capter l’Attention : Les Aspects Juridiques de l’Utilisation du Sexe dans la Publicité Française.” Mémoire de Recherche, Social Sciences University, Toulouse, France. _______________ (2010), “Porno-chic et Indécence Médiatique : Contributions Interdisciplinaires sur les Enjeux Socio-Juridiques et Communicationnels des Contenus Sexuels dans les Médias de Masse Français et Américains,” doctoral dissertation (Law and Communication), Social Science University, Toulouse, France. McNair, B. (1996), Mediated Sex: Pornography and Post-Modern Culture. London and New York: Arnold. _________ (2002), Striptease Culture, Sex, Media and the Democratisation of Desire. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Rapport IFM (2008), Rapport sur l’Image des Femmes dans les Médias. Paris: Commission de Réflexion sur l’Image des Femmes dans les Médias, 25 September. Rapport IFP (2001), Rapport du Groupe d’Experts sur l’Image des Femmes dans la Publicité. Paris: Secrétaire d’Etat aux Droits des Femmes et à la Formation Professionnelle, July.
15 Reichert, Tom (2003), The Erotic History of Advertising. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Richards, Jef I. (2009), “Common Fallacies in Law-Related Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(1), 174-180. Rotfeld, Herbert J. (1992), “Power and Limitations of Media Clearance Practices and Advertising Self-Regulation,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(Spring), 87-95. _______________ (2003), “Desires Versus the Reality of Self-Regulation,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37(2), 424-427. _______________ and M.R. Stafford (2007), “Toward a Pragmatic Understanding of the Advertising and Public Policy Literature,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 29(1), 67-80. _______________ and Charles R. Taylor (2009), “Advertising Regulation and Self-Regulation Issues Ripped from the Headlines With (Sometimes Missed) Opportunities for Disciplined Multidisciplinary Research,” Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 5-14. Teyssier, Jean-Pierre (2004), Frapper sans Heurter: Quelle Éthique pour la Publicité? Paris: Armand Colin. _________________ (2011), “Advertising Regulation and Self-Regulation in France.” Working paper to be published as a chapter in a forthcoming book edited by Mary Alice Shaver and to be published by M.E. Sharpe. Trumbull, Gunnar (2006), Consumer Capitalism: Politics, Product Markets, and Firm Strategy in France and Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document