Controversial television advertising has always caused a moral dilemma. Television commercials during the Super Bowl, one of the most watched television programs, walk a fine line between appropriate and inappropriate. However, there are quite a few varying opinions regarding the controversial advertisements. Controversial television advertisements that air during the Super Bowl generate millions of dollars, entertain the viewers, and stir up many a conversation. The viewers that seek to censor controversial advertising during the Super Bowl should consider censoring their own televisions. Reported by NFL.com (2007), there were 93.2 million viewers that tuned in to watch one single television program on February 4, 2007. Super Bowl XLI has taken the honor of now being ranked the third most watched television program in the United States of America. This now follows Super Bowl XXX and the series finale of M.A.S.H. Because of the high volume of viewers, advertising during one of these events has now become prime real estate with a prime price tag to match. This, however, does not scare away the top advertisers. Networks demand top dollar for advertisements during the Super Bowl. Commercials during this year's Super Bowl reached the pinnacle of 2.6 million dollars per 30-second spot (LaMonica, 2007). This surpassed last year's 2.5 million dollars. This has been a steadily growing trend. The Super Bowl XXX in 1996 was reported to bring in one million dollars per 30-second ad. The fact that Super Bowl ads have doubled in price in 10 years highlights the fact that the advertisers are willing to do anything to put their product in the public eye, regardless of the high controversy. The 1st Amendment of the Constitution guarantees free speech. However, there are quite a few people who believe television advertising during the Super Bowl should be censored. Parents, teachers, and self-appointed watchdog groups are often the instigators when it comes to...
References: Hartlaub, P. (2007, January 31). Super Bowl games vs. Commercials. Retrieved May 6,
2007 from http://www.sfgate.com/cgibin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/31/
May 3, 2007, from http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/03/news/funny/superbowl_
NFL.com. (2007, February, 5). Colts-Bears draws No. 3 audience of all time.
Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.superbowl.com/news/story/9976864
Petrecca, Laura (2007, February 13). Amateurs ' ad ideas come up winners. Retrieved
May 15, 2007, from USA Today Web site: http://www.usatoday.com/money/
Rosenthal, P (2007, February 24)
Retrieved May 15, 2007, from Chicago Tribune Web site: http://www.
Steves, R (2005, August, 25). Prudishness is one thing; censorship quite another. USA Today,
Retrieved May 31, 2007, from University of Phoenix, University Library, EBSCOhost
Triplett, W. (2007, April 16). Stars and gripes forever. Variety, 406 (9), 6-90. Retrieved April 26,
2007, from University of Phoenix, University Library, EBSCOhost database.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document