DIVIDEND POLICY DETERMINANTS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE INFLUENCES OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY by Mark E. Holder, Frederick W. Langrehr, J. Lawrence Hexter There is considerable debate on how dividend policy affects firm value. Some researchers believe that dividends increase shareholder wealth (Gordon, 1959), others believe that dividends are irrelevant (Miller and Scholes, 1978), and still others believe that dividends decrease shareholder wealth (Litzenberger and Ramaswamy, 1979). Financial management research on financing policy decisions, including the dividend decision, considers investment as an exogenous variable, or at least as having a fixed, known distribution. However, recent research (Cornell and Shapiro, 1987; Peterson and Benesh, 1983; Prezas, 1988; and Ravid, 1988) suggests that there are interactions between investment and financing decisions. Cornell and Shapiro (1987) posit that non-investor stakeholders (customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, and other firms providing complementary goods and services) influence this interaction of investment and financing decisions. We investigate the influence of these stakeholders on firms' dividend policy by examining the interaction between the dividend and investment policies. We propose that both non-investor stakeholders and capital suppliers have an impact on a firm's dividend policy. To test this proposition, we use a more direct measure of free cash flow as a way to relate dividends and agency costs and an objective smoothing procedure on the dividend-payout ratios. Our results indicate that an interaction between the dividend and investment policies of a firm does exist. This paper is divided into five parts. In Section I, we review the related literature and provide background information on stakeholder theory and dividend policy. In Section II, we discuss our empirical model, followed by a sample description in Section III. We report our empirical results in Section IV. The final section discusses the implications of our results and provides concluding remarks. I. Background
One group of financial theorists (Martin, Petty, Keown, and Scott, 1991; Miller, 1986; and Miller and Modigliani, 1961) provides a hypothesis for dividend policy irrelevance. This group bases its theory on the assumptions of 1) perfect capital markets, meaning no taxes or transaction costs exist, the market price cannot be influenced by a single buyer or seller, and there is costless access to information; 2) rational behavior on the part of participants in the market, valuing securities based on the discounted value of future cash flows accruing to investors; 3) certainty about the investment policy of the firm and complete knowledge of these cash flows; and 4) managers that act as perfect agents of the shareholders. For dividend policy to matter, one or more of these assumptions cannot hold. One critical assumption that may not hold is certainty about the investment policy of the firm. Titman (1984) develops a model that hypothesizes a possible interaction between investment and financing decisions. His model suggests that equity holders have incentives to maximize the wealth of non-investor stakeholders in a firm. These stakeholders suffer costs in the event the firm liquidates. Their costs can take the form of job search costs by employees, increased maintenance costs for customers, or retooling costs for suppliers. The firm may also bear some costs of uncertainty. Its customers may believe they will bear liquidation costs if the firm goes out of business, and they will discount the price they are willing to pay for its goods and services to reflect these anticipated costs. Customers can thus use capital structure as one indicator of the future default potential of their vendors. Stakeholder theory, developed by Cornell and Shapiro (1987), complements the work of Titman (1984) by looking at the implicit claims on the firm. It is the implicit claims aspect of Cornell and Shapiro's...
References: Barton, S.L., N.C. Hill, and S. Sundaram, 1989, "An Empirical Test of Stakeholder Theory Predictions of Capital Structure," Financial Management (Spring), 36-44.
Bathala, C.T., K.P. Moon, and R.P. Rao, 1994, "Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impact of Institutional Holdings: An Agency Perspective," Financial Management (Autumn), 38-50.
Comment, R. and G.A. Jarrell, 1991, "Corporate Focus and Stock Returns," University of Rochester Working Paper (May).
Comment, R. and G.A. Jarrell, 1995, "Corporate Focus and Stock Returns," Journal of Financial Economics (January), 67-87.
Cornell, B. and A.C. Shapiro, 1987, "Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance," Financial Management (Spring), 5-14.
Crutchley, C.E., 1987, "The Agency Cost of Financial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis," Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (July).
Gordon, M.J., 1959, "Dividends, Earnings and Stock Prices," Review of Economics and Statistics (May), 99-105.
Jensen, M.C., 1983, "Organization Theory and Methodology," Accounting Review (April), 319-339.
Jensen, M.C., 1986a, "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review (May), 323-329.
Jensen, M.C., 1986b, "The Takeover Controversy: Analysis and Evidence," Midland Corporate Finance Journal (Summer), 6-32.
Lintner, J., 1956, "Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes," American Economic Review (May), 97-113.
Litzenberger, R.H. and Krishna Ramaswamy, 1979, "The Effect of Personal Taxes and Dividends on Capital Asset Prices: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Financial Economics (June), 163-195.
Lloyd, W.P., J.S. Jahera, and D.E. Page, 1985, "Agency Costs and Dividend-Payout Ratios," Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics (Summer), 19-29.
Martin, J.D., J.W. Petty, A.J. Keown, and D.F. Scott, 1991, Basic Financial Management. 5th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Miller, M.H., 1986, "Can Management Use Dividends to Influence the Value of the Firm?" in J.M. Stern and D.H. Chew Jr., Eds., The Revolution in Corporate Finance, New York, NY, Basil Blackwell, 299-303.
Miller, M.H. and F. Modigliani, 1961, "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares," Journal of Business (October), 411-433.
Miller, M.H. and M.S. Scholes, 1978, "Dividends and Taxes," Journal of Financial Economics (December), 333-364.
Myers, S.C., 1984, "The Capital Structure Puzzle," Journal of Finance (July), 575-592.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M.H. Kutner, 1985, Applied Linear Statistical Models 2nd ed., Homewood, IL, Irwin, Inc.
Peterson, P.P. and G.A. Benesh, 1983, "A Reexamination of the Empirical Relationship between Investment and Financing Decisions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (December), 439-453.
Prezas, A.P., 1988, "Interactions of the Firm 's Real and Financial Decisions," Applied Economics (April), 551-560.
Ravid, S.A., 1988, "On Interactions of Production and Financial Decisions," Financial Management (Autumn), 87-99.
Rozeff, M.S., 1982, "Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend-Payout Ratios," Journal of Financial Research (Fall), 249-259.
Shapiro, A.C., 1990, Modern Corporate Finance, New York, NY, Macmillan Publishing Co.
StatSoft, Inc, 1998, STATISTICA for Windows, Tulsa, OK, StatSoft, Inc.
Subrahmanyam, V., N. Rangan, and S. Rosenstein, 1997, "The Role of Outside Directors in Bank Acquisitions," Financial Management (Autumn), 23-36.
Titman, S., 1984, "The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm 's Liquidation Decision," Journal of Financial Economics (March), 137-151.
Velleman, P.F. and D.C. Hoaglin, 1981, Applications, Basics and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis, Belmont, CA, Duxbury Press.
Vogt, S.C., 1994, "The Cash Flow/Investment Relationship: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms," Financial Management (Summer), 3-20.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document