Journal of International Management 17 (2011) 333–347
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of International Management
International diversiﬁcation and the market value of new
Chi-Feng Wang a,1, Li-Yu Chen b,⁎, Shao-Chi Chang c,2
Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan Department of Management, Fo Guang University, Taiwan
Institute of International Business, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Received 11 January 2011
Received in revised form 31 March 2011
Accepted 31 March 2011
Available online 2 May 2011
New product introduction
Although previous studies on international diversification are plentiful, they mainly focus on the effect of international diversification on overall firm performance, and the results are mixed. This study extends this line of research and explores the impact of international diversification on new product performance. Specifically, we ask if international diversification explains the stock market reactions to new product introduction (NPI) announcements. We find an inverted-U-shaped relationship between international diversification and the announcement returns of NPIs, revealing that the market value of NPIs initially improves and then declines with increasing international diversification. The results also show that intangible assets, such as technological and marketing capabilities, positively moderate the relationship between international diversification and the market value of NPIs. Our study not only highlights the importance of considering both sides of international diversification in affecting investors' assessments of corporate new product strategies, but also shows the possibility of internal capabilities in changing the fixed relationship between international diversification and the market value of new products.
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
According to the theory of foreign direct investment (FDI) (Caves, 1996; Dunning, 1988; Hymer, 1976) and portfolio theory (Jacquillat and Solnik, 1978; Lessard, 1973, 1976; Solnik, 1974), international diversiﬁcation will lead to higher ﬁrm value. However, existing studies examining the impact of international diversiﬁcation on ﬁrm performance have yielded inconclusive results. The results on the relationship between international diversiﬁcation and ﬁrm performance has been found to be positive (Delios and Beamish, 1999; Grant, 1987; Rugman et al., 2008), negative (Collins, 1990; Zaheer and Mosakowski, 1997), U-shaped (Capar and Kotabe, 2003; Gaur and Kumar, 2009; Lu and Beamish, 2001), inverted-U-shaped (Brock et al., 2006; Garbe and Richter, 2009; Gomes and Ramaswamy, 1999; Hitt et al., 1997) and horizontal-S-shaped (Contractor et al., 2003; Lu and Beamish, 2004; Ruigrok et al., 2007).
To better understand the inﬂuence of international diversiﬁcation, we extend this line of research by studying the impact of international diversiﬁcation on new product performance. Speciﬁcally, we test if international diversiﬁcation explains the stock
⁎ Corresponding author at: Present address: Department of Management, Fo Guang University, No. 160, Linwei Rd., Jiaosi, Yilan County 26247, Taiwan. Tel.: + 886 3 9871000 23816.
E-mail addresses: firstname.lastname@example.org (C.-F. Wang), email@example.com (L.-Y. Chen), firstname.lastname@example.org (S.-C. Chang). 1
Present address: Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, No.123, University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan. Tel.: + 886 5 5342601x5245.
Present address: Institute of International Business, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, 701, Tainan, Taiwan. Tel.: + 886 6 2757575x53506. 1075-4253/$ – see front matter ©...
References: Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., 1988. Innovation in large and small ﬁrms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review 78, 678–690.
Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park.
Austin, D.H., 1993. An event-study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review 83, 253–258.
Barkema, H., Vermeulen, F., 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: a learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal 41, 7–26.
Bartlett, C.A., Ghoshal, S., 1989. Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Benou, G., Madura, J., Ngo, T., 2008. Wealth creation from high-tech divestitures. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 48, 505–519.
Bowman, R.G., 1983. Understanding and conducting event studies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 10 (4), 561–584.
Bowman, E.H., Helfat, C.E., 2001. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal 22, 1–23.
Bowman, R.G., Navissi, F., 2003. Earnings management and abnormal returns: evidence from the 1970–1972 price control regulations. Accounting and Finance 43,
Brock, D.M., Yaffe, T., Dembovsky, M., 2006. International diversiﬁcation and performance: a study of global law ﬁrms. Journal of International Management 12,
Brown, S.J., 1989. The number of factors in security returns. Journal of Finance 44 (5), 1247–1262.
Brown, S.J., Warner, J.B., 1980. Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics 8, 205–258.
Brown, S.J., Warner, J.B., 1985. Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31.
Capar, N., Kotabe, M., 2003. The relationship between international diversiﬁcation and performance in service ﬁrms. Journal of International Business Studies 34,
Cardinal, L.B., Opler, T.C., 1995. Corporate diversiﬁcation & innovative efﬁciency: an empirical study. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 365–381.
Caves, R.E., 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Chan, S., Martin, J., Kensinger, J., 1990. Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics 26, 255–276.
Chandy, R.K., Tellis, G.J., 2000. The incumbent 's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64, 1–17.
Chaney, P.K., Devinney, T.M., Winer, R.S., 1991. The impact of new product introductions on the market value of ﬁrms. Journal of Business 64, 573–610.
Chang, S.J., Singh, H., 2000. An evolutionary perspective on diversiﬁcation and corporate restructuring: entry, exit and economic performance during 1981–1989.
Chang, S.C., Wang, C.F., 2007. The effect of product diversiﬁcation strategies on the relationship between international diversiﬁcation and ﬁrm performance.
Chen, S.S., 2008. Organizational form and the economic impact of corporate new product strategies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 35 (1), 71–101.
Chen, S.S., Ho, K.W., Ik, K.H., Lee, C.F., 2002. How does strategic competition affect ﬁrm values? A study of new product announcements. Financial Management 31,
Collins, J.M., 1990. A market performance comparison of U.S. ﬁrms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business
Studies 21 (2), 271–287.
Contractor, F.J., Kundu, S.K., Hsu, C.C., 2003. A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J., 1987. New products: what separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management 4 (3), 169–184.
Craig, C.S., Douglas, S.P., 2000. Conﬁgural advantage in global markets. Journal of International Marketing 8 (1), 6–26.
Daniels, J.D., Bracker, J., 1989. Proﬁt performance: do foreign operations make a difference? Management International Review 29, 46–56.
Danneels, E., 2002. The dynamics of product innovation and ﬁrm competences. Strategic Management Journal 23, 1095–1121.
Das, S., Sen, P.K., Sengupta, S., 1998. Impact of strategic alliances on ﬁrm valuation. Academy of Management Journal 41, 27–41.
Day, G.S., 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 58 (3), 37–52.
Delios, A., Beamish, P.W., 1999. Geographic scope, product diversiﬁcation, and the corporate performance of Japanese ﬁrms. Strategic Management Journal 20,
Doukas, J.A., Lang, L.H.P., 2003. Foreign direct investment, diversiﬁcation and ﬁrm performance. Journal of International Business Studies 34, 153–172.
Dowling, G.R., Staelin, R., 1994. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research 1 (1), 119–135.
Dunning, J.H., 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19
Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S., 1999. Success in high-technology markets: is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science 18, 547–568.
Fama, E.F., 1970. Efﬁcient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 25, 383–417.
Firth, R., Narayanan, V., 1996. New product strategies of large, dominant product manufacturing ﬁrms: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Product Innovation
Management 13, 334–347.
Francis, J., Smith, A., 1995. Agency costs & innovation: some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 383–409.
Doukas and Lang (2003) examined performance of ﬁrms that announce geographical diversiﬁcation, Healy et al
and acquisitions, and Kale et al. (2002) and Koh and Venkatraman (1991) tested the impacts of strategic alliances and joint ventures respectively on ﬁrm value.
Garbe, J., Richter, N.F., 2009. Causal analysis of the internationalization and performance relationship based on neural networks-advocating the transnational
Gaur, A.S., Kumar, V., 2009. International diversiﬁcation, business group afﬁliation and ﬁrm performance: empirical evidence from India. British Journal of
Management 20 (2), 172–186.
Gomes, L., Ramaswamy, K., 1999. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International
Business Studies 30, 173–188.
Grant, R.M., 1987. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies 18 (3), 79–89.
Healy, P.M., Palepu, K.G., Ruback, R.S., 1992. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics 31 (2), 135–175.
Helsen, K., Jedidi, K., DeSarbo, W.S., 1993. A new approach to country segmentation utilizing multinational diffusion patterns. Journal of Marketing 57, 60–71.
Hendricks, K.B., Singhal, V.R., 1997. Delays in new product introductions and the market value of ﬁrm: the consequences of being late to the market. Management
Science 43, 422–436.
Hill, C.M.L., Snell, S.A., 1988. External control, corporate strategy and ﬁrm performance in research intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal 9, 579–590.
Hirsch, S., Lev, B., 1971. Sales stabilization through export diversiﬁcation. Review of Economic and Statistics 53, 258–266.
Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Johnson, R.A., Moesel, D.D., 1996. The market for corporate control & ﬁrm innovation. Academy of Management Journal 39, 1084–1119.
Hitt, M.A., Hoskinsson, R.E., Kim, H., 1997. International diversiﬁcation and ﬁrm performance in product-diversiﬁed ﬁrms. Academy of Management Journal 40 (4),
Hoskisson, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Dubofsky, D.A., 1991. Capital market evaluation of m-form implementation and diversiﬁcation strategy. Strategic Management
Journal 12, 271–279.
Hymer, S.H., 1976. A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Inkpen, A.C., 2000. Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies 37 (7), 1019–1043.
Jacquillat, B., Solnik, B., 1978. Multinationals are poor tools for diversiﬁcation. Journal of Portfolio Management 4 (2), 8–12.
Jensen, M.C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash ﬂow, corporate ﬁnance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76, 323–329.
Jovanovic, B., MacDonald, G.M., 1994. The life cycle of a competitive industry. Journal of Political Economy 102, 322–347.
Kale, P., Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., 2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic
Management Journal 23, 747–767.
Kalyanaram, G., Robinson, W.T., Urban, G.L., 1995. Order of entry: established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research.
Kelm, K.M., Narayanan, V.K., Pinches, G.E., 1995. Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management
Journal 38, 770–786.
Kim, W.C., Hwang, P., Burgers, W.P., 1989. Global diversiﬁcation strategy and corporate proﬁt performance. Strategic Management Journal 10, 45–57.
Kim, W.C., Hwang, P., Burgers, W.P., 1993. Multinationals ' diversiﬁcation and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal 14, 275–286.
Kleinschmidt, E., Cooper, R., 1991. The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 8, 240–251.
Kobrin, S.J., 1991. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal 12, 17–37.
Kogut, B., 1985. Designing global strategies: comparative and competitive value-added chains. Sloan Management Review 27, 15–28.
Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1993. Knowledge of the ﬁrm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24,
Koh, J., Venkatraman, N., 1991. Joint venture formations and stock market reactions: an assessment in the information technology sector. Academy of Management
Journal 34, 869–892.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document